top of page
grad-purple-blue.png

Quality Management Plan (D1.2)

Methodology

Training

Intervention

Tool

Data

Study

Use case

George Oikonomou and Theo Tryfonas, University of Bristol

Overview

Deliverable D1.2 provides a single reference point for quality management across ELABORATOR. It distinguishes Quality Assurance, which establishes the processes needed to prevent errors, from Quality Control, which checks and accepts or rejects completed outputs. The plan focuses especially on deliverables, internal reporting, dissemination and financial reporting. For readers managing collaborative research or innovation projects, it offers a concrete workflow for maintaining quality from early planning through final submission.


Highlights

• Quality management tools: SharePoint is defined as the consortium-wide document platform, supported by a deliverable register and a quality metrics register.

• Clear responsibilities: The plan assigns quality duties to the Project Coordinator, Risk and Quality Manager, Technical Management Team, Work Package Leaders, Deliverable Leaders, contributors and peer reviewers.

• Standardised deliverable structure: Mandatory templates cover document control, version history, executive summaries, introductions, conclusions and annexes, along with naming and versioning conventions.

• Planned life cycle: Work starts four months before the deadline with the purpose and audience, followed by the table of contents, drafting, internal review, peer review, revision and submission.

• Progress checkpoints: Deliverables are tracked at 10%, 40%, 80%, 90% and 100% completion, from the first table of contents to formal submission.

• Peer review: Two independent consortium experts review each deliverable using a structured evaluation form that checks relevance, technical approach, organisation, completeness, conclusions and formal quality.


Conclusion

The framework gives project teams a repeatable process for producing reliable and consistent outputs. It also makes progress and responsibility visible early enough to correct quality problems before submission. The deliverable does not report city-level impact, but it supports the quality of all technical and implementation work produced by the project.

Full materials

Share this page:

Stay in touch!

Sign up to our mailing list to receive exclusive access to our newsletter and stay up to date with the latest project news and events.

Thanks for submitting!

Elaborator logo
  • LinkedIn
  • X

© 2023 Elaborator

Crafted with ♥️ by Threerooms

Co-funded EU logo

Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or CINEA. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

Civitas-Logo
EU-Mission-Logo

ELABORATOR is part of the CIVITAS Initiative and contributes to the goals of the EU Mission: Climate-Neutral and Smart Cities

UKRI logo [W].png

UKRI supports UK participants with grant numbers 10078745 (iRAP ) and 10069203 (UBRIS)

bottom of page